Squabbly games

2003-09-29T11:24:52+00:00

So last night we bought the game
Munchkin, and took it over to the abode of some friends. Munchkin is a rather simple game with a lot of rules (no, really) which pokes fun at the stereotypical D&D dungeon crawl — each player controls a “character” who is really no more than the sum of their magic items, and you all kill monsters and take their stuff while lying, bribing, and cheating your way to the top of the pack. Towards the end of the evening, when sleep was seeming appealing and victory was lurking around, waiting to pounce, a little bit of grumpiness entered the atmosphere. Not big grumpiness, not shouting or tooth-gnashing or anything, but I guess I am a big cholerophobe, because when we left, my stomach was clenched like a child’s fist around an enemy’s ponytail.

So today I will be musing on competitiveness in games — not the characteristics in a person which make them prone to it, but the characteristics in a GAME which encourage it.

I mentioned to Matt in the car that he had in the past put his dislike of my beloved
Lunch Money down to its over-competitive nastiness, while he is a big fan of Munchkin. He responded that Munchkin does not force you to attack other players, whereas in Lunch Money, that’s the entire action of the game.

Upon further rumination, I think that may be part of the problem! At first, in Munchkin, you have to be nice to people so they’ll help you. But as the game progresses, attacks start to be advantageous or necessary. In one case, some people are ahead and no one will help them anyway, so they are free to alienate the others. In another, someone will win if you don’t attack them, so you jolly well attack them! Let’s face it, the game has, “Stab your buddy” as part of the tagline. By the end, you’re doing all sorts of nasty things in-game when everyone is used to the more cooperative feel of the beginning of the game. Whereas in Lunch Money, you have to hurt people from the beginning — it’s not a shock, it’s not a betrayal, it’s the way the game is played. You are emotionally detached from the “nastiness”.

Also, Lunch Money is a short game. You die? You get dealt back in in 10 minutes. I think our game of Munchkin yesterday took more than two hours.

Furthermore, I think people get grouchy when they have built something and it is taken away from them or ruined. Magic: the Gathering is prone to this. Settlers of Catan, much less — and you’ll note that almost nothing you have built or acquired in Catan (roads, settlements) can be taken from you. In Magic, every freaking thing can. In Lunch Money or Brawl, you don’t build anything. In Munchkin, you do. I think we get angry when people knock down our blocks. Or our house of cards.

Help me out here

2003-08-29T11:17:08+00:00

I like to play the roleplaying game Exalted. When I can’t play it, I like to wish I was playing it, and discuss it over on the RPG.net forums. One supplemental volume for the game, which allows you to play an Undead Thing with kewl gear and 133+ powerz (as opposed to a Shining Hero with k.g. and 1.p.) is Exalted: the Abyssals.

A lot of discussion about this book centers around the cover:

Many people coughfanboyscough claim to have bought this book ($30 hardback!) SOLELY because the cover-girl, Maiden of the Mirthless Smile, is hot.

My problem? I don’t think she’s hot! She’s kind of blurry, her face is undead vanilla, the shoes AND the gloves say “clown” to me… is it just the big sword coupled with the “mammaries of death”? I’d just like some honest opinions from my readers here. I won’t judge you, squirt you with holy water, or drive a wooden stake through your heart. Scout’s Honor.

Posts tagged with "gamer" - Faerye Net

Squabbly games

Help me out here