http://faerye.net/tag/cephalopodPosts tagged with "cephalopod" - Faerye Net2006-10-22T22:44:30+00:00Felicity Shouldershttp://faerye.net/http://faerye.net/post/shocktopusSHOCKtopus!2006-10-22T22:44:30+00:002008-06-08T12:41:57+00:00<p>From the pages of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octopus" target="links">wikipedia</a>:
</p><blockquote><p><b>Terminology</b>
<br />
Fowler’s Modern English Usage states that “the only acceptable plural in English is octopuses”, and that octopi is misconceived and octopodes pedantic. Octopi derives from the mistaken notion that <em>octōpūs</em> is a second declension Latin noun, which it is not. Rather, it is (Latinized) Greek, from <em>oktṓpous</em> (ὀκτώπους), gender masculine, whose plural is <em>oktṓpodes </em> (ὀκτώποδες). If the word were native to Latin, it would be <em>octōpēs</em> (‘eight-foot’) and the plural <em>octōpedes</em>, analogous to <em>centipedes</em> and <em>mīllipedes</em>, as the plural form of <em>pēs</em> (‘foot’) is pedes. In modern, informal Greek, it is called <em>khtapódi</em> (χταπόδι), gender neuter, with plural form <em>khtapódia</em> (χταπόδια).
</p><p>
Merriam-Webster and other dictionaries accept <em>octopi</em> as a plural form. The Oxford English Dictionary lists <em>octopuses</em>, <em>octopi</em>, and <em>octopodes</em> in order of descending frequency of use. The term <em>octopod</em> (either plural <em>octopods</em> and <em>octopodes</em> can be found) is taken from the taxonomic order <em>octopoda</em> but has no classical equivalent. The collective form <em>octopus</em> is usually reserved for animals consumed for food.</p></blockquote>
<p>I am totally flabbergasted. I have been using ‘octopi’ (though blessedly not on this website) for <em>years</em>! I guess I had better use ‘octopodes’, because it says ‘octopodes’ is pedantic, and I can never pass up pedantry.</p>